It’s a question that hits differently, doesn’t it? It’s not just a debate-club topic. It’s the one that hangs in the air when we’re staring at a ceiling fan at 3 AM, or when we’re holding a newborn, or when we’ve just gotten the worst news of our life. We all have to face the wall of mortality. We all wonder if this is it. For billions of us, the answer to that massive, terrifying “what’s next?” question boils down to a much more specific one: Is Jesus Christ alive?
Think about it. If he’s not, if the resurrection was a well-meaning story, a mistake, or a lie… then Christianity is a 2,000-year-old house of cards. But if he is? If the claim is fact? Then everything, and I mean everything, changes. It changes death. It changes life. It changes how we see our own messy, beautiful, broken story. This isn’t about some dusty event. It’s about a present-day reality.
So, let’s really look at this. Let’s peel back the layers, not as a history lesson, but as a living investigation.
More in About Jesus Category
Key Takeaways
- The resurrection isn’t just a “faith” story; its earliest proponents claimed it as a real, datable event. We can, and should, investigate it that way.
- The three pillars of the case are: the tomb was empty, the eyewitnesses were many, and the followers were radically, permanently changed.
- The most powerful proof might be the “impossible” conversions. Jesus’s own skeptical brother (James) and his worst enemy (Paul) both became leaders of the movement, and both died for it.
- For millions today, the evidence isn’t just in history books. It’s in a personal, lived-out, two-way relationship.
- This claim—that Jesus is alive—is the one non-negotiable part of Christianity. It’s what separates it from every other philosophy or world religion.
But Isn’t This Just an Ancient Myth?
I know what you’re thinking. Because I’ve thought it.
“Resurrection? Really? In 2025?”
It sounds like a fantasy novel, not real life. I get it. For a long time, I mentally filed this story away with Greek myths. But there’s a difference, and it’s a big one. Nobody ever claimed to have had lunch with Zeus. The stories of Apollo were always “once upon a time.”
The resurrection claim was different from day one. The first people who spread it didn’t say, “Here’s a nice legend to make you feel hopeful.” They said, “This happened. Last week. In Jerusalem. We saw him. We ate with him. Pontius Pilate was the governor.” They pinned their claim to a specific time and a specific place.
That’s a gutsy move. It makes the claim testable. It invites you to try and poke holes in it. And that’s exactly what we should do.
Did Jesus Even Exist in the First Place?
You can’t even get to the main question without settling this one. Was he a real guy?
Yes. Emphatically, yes.
This isn’t really a debate among professional historians anymore, secular or otherwise. Outside of some internet comment sections, the consensus is locked. Jesus of Nazareth was a real, historical man.
We have multiple sources outside the New Testament. The Roman historians Tacitus and Suetonius mention him. The Jewish historian Josephus does, too. None of them were fans. Tacitus was a Roman aristocrat who called this new faith a “mischievous superstition.” But he confirms that its founder (Christus) was a real person, who lived in Judea, and was executed by Pontius Pilate.
So, we’re not talking about a myth. We’re talking about a man. The real question is what happened after that man died.
Okay, But What’s the Big Deal About an Empty Tomb?
An empty tomb, all by itself, doesn’t prove a resurrection. It just proves… an empty tomb. It’s the starting line, not the finish line.
But what a starting line it is. All four Gospels, our earliest and most detailed accounts, are unanimous on this. The women go to the tomb early Sunday morning. The stone—a massive, heavy disc—is rolled away. The body is gone.
Here’s the fascinating part: look at how the authorities reacted.
Just a few weeks later, the disciples are back in that same city, Jerusalem, shouting from the rooftops, “He is risen!” The authorities are furious. They arrest them, they beat them, they threaten them. But there’s one thing they never do.
They never produce the body.
If they had the body, that’s all it would have taken. End of story. One public parade of Jesus’s corpse, and this “mischievous superstition” would have died instantly. But they couldn’t.
Instead, the only counter-story we ever hear (reported in Matthew’s Gospel) is that the authorities bribed the guards to say the disciples stole the body while they were asleep. Think about that. Their own PR spin was, in itself, a-massive admission: “The tomb is, in fact, empty.”
That just leaves one burning question.
Could the Disciples Have Just Faked It All?
This is where the story, for me, gets intensely compelling. This theory asks us to believe that this small group of fishermen and tax collectors, defeated, heartbroken, and scared for their lives, decided to pull off the greatest conspiracy in human history.
Let’s just walk through the logic.
This would mean they:
- Bravely overpowered a unit of trained Roman or Temple guards.
- Stole the body (a capital offense).
- Hid a decomposing corpse somewhere.
- Sat down and invented a story they knew was a total lie.
- And then… went out and preached that lie in the very city where the “crime” took place, right under the noses of the people who wanted them dead.
Does that sound plausible?
Why Would They Die for Something They Knew Was a Lie?
This, for me, is the absolute deal-breaker for the “conspiracy” theory.
People will absolutely die for a belief. They’ll die for what they think is true. But men won’t die, one by one, over decades, for something they know they invented. The human psyche doesn’t work that way. Someone would have cracked.
What did the disciples get for their “lie”?
- Wealth? No, they lived in poverty and shared all their possessions.
- Power? No, they were hunted, excommunicated, and lived as fugitives.
- Comfort? No, they were beaten, shipwrecked, imprisoned, and stoned.
Tradition tells us that 10 of the original 11 (minus Judas) died as martyrs. Peter was crucified, but upside down because he didn’t feel worthy to die the same way as Jesus. Andrew was crucified on an X-shaped cross. James was beheaded.
These aren’t the actions of men protecting a lie. These are the actions of men who had been transformed. They went from a group of terrified cowards (who all ran and hid when Jesus was arrested) to the boldest evangelists in history.
You have to ask: what accounts for that change? A story they made up? Or an experience that changed them forever?
What’s the Significance of Women Being the First Witnesses?
If you were inventing a story in the first century, you would make it as believable as possible to a first-century audience. And if you were doing that, you would never, ever make women your primary witnesses.
It’s a harsh fact of history, but in both Jewish and Roman culture at the time, a woman’s testimony was considered legally worthless. It wasn’t admissible in court.
And yet, all four Gospels are crystal clear: the first people to discover the empty tomb and the first people to see the risen Jesus were women. Mary Magdalene. Joanna. Another Mary.
This is a detail that, for many historians, screams “authenticity.” It’s what scholars call the “criterion of embarrassment.” It’s a detail so counter-productive, so unhelpful to their “case,” that the only reason to include it is because it’s what actually happened. They were reporting, not inventing.
Weren’t the Sightings Just Hallucinations?
This is a more popular modern theory. It’s more compassionate. It suggests the disciples weren’t liars; they were just grieving. They were heartbroken. They wanted to see Jesus so badly that their traumatized minds created the experience.
We know grief can do strange things. It can cause people to momentarily see or feel the presence of a lost loved one.
But does this theory actually fit the facts?
First, the nature of the appearances. These weren’t just fleeting glimpses or a “feeling.” The accounts describe Jesus eating fish to prove he was physical. He invited them to touch his wounds. He held long, detailed conversations.
Second, the sheer variety of the appearances. He appeared to them indoors, outdoors, by a lake, on a road. He appeared to one person, then to two, then to ten, then to a whole group.
And most importantly: hallucinations are private, internal events. They happen inside your head. My hallucination is not your hallucination. The idea of a “mass hallucination”—where multiple people, at the same time, in the same place, all share the exact same hallucination—is not a recognized psychological phenomenon.
Could Over 500 People Hallucinate the Same Thing?
This is the challenge the Apostle Paul, a brilliant contemporary, throws down.
Writing in his first letter to the Corinthians (a document dated to the 50s AD, just 20-25 years after the event), Paul isn’t arguing. He’s reminding. He’s quoting a creed—a short, memorized summary of facts—that scholars believe is one of the earliest, most primitive pieces of Christian belief, dating to just years after the crucifixion.
He says Jesus appeared to Peter. Then to the twelve. And then, “he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep.”
That is an absolutely stunning, audacious claim.
He wasn’t just stating a fact; he was issuing a challenge to a first-century audience. He was saying, “You don’t believe me? Go ask them. They’re still around. Go talk to them.”
A private hallucination? Maybe. A group of 500 people all having the same one? That’s not a hallucination. That’s an event.
What About the Hardcore Skeptics Who Converted?
This might be the most powerful evidence of all. Forget the apostles; they were already biased. They loved Jesus.
Let’s talk about the people who didn’t. Let’s talk about the skeptics. Two, in particular, stand out.
James was Jesus’s brother. His own, flesh-and-blood, grew-up-in-the-same-house brother. And the Gospels are painfully honest: during Jesus’s lifetime, his own family thought he was “out of his mind” (Mark 3:21). They were embarrassed by him. They were not followers.
Yet, a few years after Jesus’s death, who is the undisputed leader of the entire Jerusalem church? James. He’s the one who calls the shots. And he, too, goes on to be martyred for his faith… in his brother.
What happened? What could possibly transform a skeptical, embarrassed brother into the primary leader of the movement, willing to die for that brother’s divinity? The New Testament’s answer is simple: the risen Jesus “appeared to James” (1 Corinthians 15:7).
Saul of Tarsus (later Paul) is even more dramatic.
He wasn’t just a skeptic; he was a persecutor. He was a brilliant, rising-star Pharisee who saw this new “resurrection” cult as a dangerous, blasphemous heresy. He had dedicated his entire life to wiping it out. He was, by his own admission, dragging men and women to prison and approving their execution.
Then, on the road to Damascus, he has an encounter. A blinding light. A voice. It knocks him to the ground and completely upends his life.
He goes from being the church’s greatest enemy to its greatest missionary. He spends the rest of his life enduring beatings, shipwrecks, and finally, his own execution, all to spread the message he once tried to destroy.
How do you explain that? A hallucination? A lie? The conversions of James and Paul are incredibly difficult to explain away. They had everything to lose—prestige, power, safety, and reputation. They had nothing to gain… unless it was true.
So, What Does This Historical Evidence Mean for Me Today?
This is where the rubber meets the road. Because if Jesus really did conquer death, he’s not just a historical figure. He’s a living person.
The claim isn’t just “He rose.” The claim is “He is risen.”
The verb is present tense.
This means the answer to “Is Jesus Christ alive?” moves from a purely academic debate to a deeply personal one. It stops being just about what happened then and becomes about what is happening now.
Can You Really Know He’s Alive in 2025?
This is where I have to stop just being a researcher and become a witness. Because, like many, I was a skeptic. I assumed this was all just stories. A psychological crutch for people who couldn’t handle the “real world.”
I remember I was in college. A science major. I needed proof, data, something I could touch. Mythology wasn’t going to cut it. I was also in a personal tailspin. I was buried in debt, my relationship had just imploded, and I felt this crushing, cosmic loneliness.
One night, it all just boiled over. It was a classic “foxhole” moment. I just… challenged the universe. I remember looking out my dorm window and saying out loud, “Jesus, if you are real… if you are alive… you have to show me. Because I’m done. I’ve got nothing.”
There was no lightning. No audible voice. But in the days and weeks that followed, something did happen. It was a slow, steady, and undeniable sense of peace. A sense of direction. It wasn’t just a feeling; it felt like an interaction. It was the beginning of a conversation that, decades later, has never stopped.
How Does a 2,000-Year-Old Event Change a Life Today?
Years later, I was a different person, facing a different kind of crisis. A real career-ender.
I had made a huge mistake. A moral failing. A choice I knew was wrong, and it had blown up in my face. It was something I knew could cost me everything. The guilt was a physical weight. I felt like a complete fraud, and frankly, I was.
I just kept thinking of Peter.
Peter, the brash, bold disciple who had sworn, “I will die for you!” And then, hours later, when the pressure was on, he crumbled. He denied he even knew Jesus. Not once, but three times.
In Peter’s story, that should have been the end. He was a failure. A coward. A fraud.
But the story doesn’t end there. After the resurrection, Jesus doesn’t just appear to Peter; he actively seeks him out. He finds him on a beach, and instead of a lecture, instead of condemnation, he restores him. He gives him a new purpose.
Believing “Is Jesus Christ alive?” wasn’t just an intellectual “yes” for me anymore. It meant that same power, that same impossible restoration, was available for me. It gave me the courage to do the hardest thing: own my mistake, confess it, ask for forgiveness from the people I’d hurt, and start to rebuild.
That’s not a dead symbol. That’s not a dusty philosophy. That is a living, breathing power.
But What Makes This Claim Different From Other Religions?
This is such an important question in our pluralistic world. We see good, moral, and loving people in every faith tradition.
But the claim of the resurrection sets Jesus apart. Fundamentally.
No other major world religion is built on this. Buddha did not rise from the dead. Muhammad did not rise from the dead. Confucius did not rise from the dead. In fact, their followers would see no need for them to. Their authority rests on the wisdom of their teachings.
Christianity is different. Its authority rests on the identity of its founder.
Jesus didn’t just come to offer a new philosophy; he came to defeat death. If he didn’t rise, the whole thing is a sham. Paul, the former skeptic, says this himself: “And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins” (1 Corinthians 15:17).
The resurrection is the lynchpin. It’s the one piece that must be true for any of the other claims to matter.
Where Else Can We See the Evidence in the World?
If a person is truly alive, they leave footprints. They have an impact. So, where are the “footprints” of the risen Jesus today?
They are in the lives of billions. They are in the addict who finds sobriety and a new purpose. They are in the broken marriage that finds a miraculous path to healing. They are in the person who finds the strength to forgive the unforgivable.
And historically? The impact is simply undeniable.
The movement that started with a handful of terrified followers in a borrowed room fundamentally reshaped the Western world. Concepts we now take for granted—the inherent, equal value of every individual (woman, child, slave, or king), the moral call to care for the poor and the sick, the very foundation of public charity—these were not the norm in the Roman Empire. This new ethic flowed directly from the belief that God, in Jesus, had loved humanity to the point of death and back again.
This belief was the engine that created the first hospitals, the first universities, the first orphanages. While the institution of the church has often failed, and failed spectacularly, to live up to its own standards, the generative power of the core resurrection message is a historical fact. You can explore the vast philosophical and cultural implications of these claims at institutions that study them, like the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’s work on the philosophy of religion.
Why Is There Still So Much Suffering if He’s Alive?
This is the hardest question. Period.
Anyone who gives you a simple, trite answer is someone you shouldn’t trust. I have stood by a hospital bed and felt that question like a physical blow. “Why?” I have seen profound injustice in the world and felt the white-hot rage of “Where are you?”
The Bible, to its credit, doesn’t shy away from this. The entire book of Job is a deep-dive into suffering. The Psalms are filled with desperate cries of “How long, O Lord?”
The resurrection is not a promise that a follower of Jesus will be exempt from pain, loss, or tragedy. It is not a magic charm against the brokenness of the world.
It is something different. It is a promise.
It is a promise that suffering and death do not get the final word. It’s a promise that this broken, aching world is not all there is. The resurrection is God’s ultimate answer to the problem of evil. It is the declaration that he has entered into our suffering with us, taken it onto himself, and defeated it from the inside. It gives meaning to a life in pain and offers a final, concrete, and victorious hope beyond pain.
So, Is He Alive?
We’ve looked at the evidence. The empty tomb. The transformed disciples. The “impossible” conversions of skeptics like James and Paul. The testimony of 500 people. The 2,000-year chain of transformed lives that continues to this very day.
This evidence, I believe, is powerful. It shows that belief in the resurrection isn’t a blind leap in the dark.
It’s a reasonable step into the light.
But in the end, history and evidence can only take you so far. They can bring you to the door. They can show you that the claim is credible, that it’s reasonable, that it’s not a myth.
But they can’t make you walk through it.
The final piece of evidence is, and always will be, personal. It’s an encounter. The question “Is Jesus Christ alive?” is not just a historical query. It’s an invitation.
He’s not just a fact to be debated. He’s a person to be known.
The only way to truly know the answer… is to ask the question yourself.
FAQ – Is Jesus Christ Alive
Why is the resurrection considered a historical event rather than a myth?
The resurrection is considered historical because the earliest proponents claimed it as a specific, testable event with witnesses, and the details provided by the Gospel accounts, such as women being the first witnesses, align with historical authenticity.
Did Jesus of Nazareth actually exist as a real person?
Yes, Jesus of Nazareth was a real historical figure, confirmed by multiple sources outside the Bible including Roman historians Tacitus and Suetonius, and Jewish historian Josephus.
Why is the empty tomb a crucial piece of evidence for the resurrection?
The empty tomb is crucial because it was never conclusively challenged by authorities; their inability to produce Jesus’s body and the subsequent relentless proclamation of the resurrection strongly suggest that the tomb was indeed found empty.
What makes the Christian claim of the resurrection different from other religious claims?
The Christian claim is unique because it is based on the belief in Jesus’s literal, physical resurrection from the dead, which any other major religion does not assert for their founders; it is the foundation of Christianity’s authority and hope.
